You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low‐back pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001824.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J Bart Staal, Rob de Bie, Henrica CW de Vet, Jan Hildebrandt, Patty Nelemans |
Abstract |
The effectiveness of injection therapy for low-back pain is still debatable. Heterogeneity of target tissue, pharmacological agent and dosage generally found in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) points to the need for clinically valid comparisons in a literature synthesis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Australia | 3 | 14% |
United States | 3 | 14% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Philippines | 1 | 5% |
North Macedonia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 363 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
Researcher | 40 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 10% |
Other | 34 | 9% |
Other | 96 | 26% |
Unknown | 84 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 10 | 3% |
Psychology | 8 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Other | 37 | 10% |
Unknown | 101 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#905,768
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,747
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,828
of 96,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.