↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing obesity in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
914 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing obesity in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001871.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Summerbell, Carolyn D, Waters, Elizabeth, Edmunds, Laurel, Kelly, Sarah AM, Brown, Tamara, Campbell, Karen J, Carolyn D Summerbell, Elizabeth Waters, Laurel Edmunds, Sarah AM Kelly, Tamara Brown, Karen J Campbell

Abstract

We describe prevalence and trends in overweight among children and adolescents (6 to 17 years old) in the US population and variation in the prevalence by sex, age, race-ethnicity, income, and educational level. Height and weight were measured in nationally representative surveys conducted between 1963 and 1994: cycles II (1963 to 1965) and III (1966 to 1970) of the National Health Examination Survey (NHES) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES I, 1971 to 1974; NHANES II, 1976 to 1980; and NHANES III, 1988 to 1994). Overweight was defined by the age- and sex-specific 95th percentile of body mass index (BMI) from NHES II and III. BMI values between the 85th and 95th percentiles were considered an area of concern, because at this level there is increased risk for becoming overweight. Approximately 11% of children and adolescents were overweight in 1988 to 1994, and an additional 14% had a BMI between the 85th and 95th percentiles. The prevalence of overweight did not vary systematically with race-ethnicity, income, or education. Overweight prevalence increased over time, with the largest increase between NHANES II and NHANES III. Examination of the entire BMI distribution showed that the heaviest children were markedly heavier in NHANES III than in NHES, but the rest of the distribution of BMI showed little change. Data are limited for assessing the causes of the rapid change in the prevalence of overweight. The increased overweight prevalence in US children and adolescents may be one manifestation of a more general set of societal effects. Childhood overweight should be addressed from a public health perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 433 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 12%
Researcher 52 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 25 6%
Other 88 19%
Unknown 89 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 11%
Social Sciences 48 11%
Psychology 35 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 8%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 107 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,654,753
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,763
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,343
of 58,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.