You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glucocorticoids for croup
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001955.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly F Russell, Yuanyuan Liang, Kathleen O'Gorman, David W Johnson, Terry P Klassen |
| Abstract |
Since the initial publication of this systematic review in 1997, several randomized trials examining the benefit of glucocorticoids have been published. The objective of this review is to provide evidence to guide clinicians in their treatment of patients with croup by determining the effectiveness of glucocorticoids and to identify areas requiring future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 185 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 19% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 29% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 66% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#675,878
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,250
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,943
of 193,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.