You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002027.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Warner, Jessal Chudasama, Charles G Kelly, Sean Loughran, Kenneth McKenzie, Richard Wight, Paola Dey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,060,727
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,512
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,542
of 368,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.