↓ Skip to main content

Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term/near term infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term/near term infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002054.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

El Shahed, Amr I, Dargaville, Peter A., Ohlsson, Arne, Soll, Roger, Amr I El Shahed, Peter A. Dargaville, Arne Ohlsson, Roger Soll

Abstract

Surfactant replacement therapy has been proven beneficial in the prevention and treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The deficiency of surfactant or surfactant dysfunction may contribute to respiratory failure in a broader group of disorders, including meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). To evaluate the effect of surfactant administration in the treatment of term/near-term infants with MAS. Searches were made using The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE and EMBASE (1985 to December 2006), previous reviews including cross-references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching. No language restrictions were applied. Authors were directly contacted to provide additional data. Randomised controlled trials which evaluated the effect of surfactant administration in term infants with meconium aspiration syndrome are included in the analyses. Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), pneumothorax, duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, intraventricular haemorrhage (any grade and severe IVH), and chronic lung disease, and were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trails by the review authors. Data analyses were done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Four randomised controlled trials met inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of 4 trials enrolling 326 infants showed no statistically significant effect on mortality (typical relative risk 0.98 (95% CI 0.41, 2.39), typical risk difference 0.00 (95% CI -0.05, 0.05). The risk of requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly reduced in a meta-analysis of two trials (n = 208); (typical relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.46, 0.91; typical risk difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.30, -0.04); number needed to treat to benefit 6 (95% CI 3, 25). One trial (n = 40) reported a statistically significant reduction in the length of hospital stay [mean difference - 8 days (95% CI -14, -3 days)]. There were no statistically significant reductions in any other outcomes studied (duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, air leaks, chronic lung disease, need for oxygen at discharge or intraventricular haemorrhage). In infants with MAS, surfactant administration may reduce the severity of respiratory illness and decrease the number of infants with progressive respiratory failure requiring support with ECMO. The relative efficacy of surfactant therapy compared to, or in conjunction with, other approaches to treatment including inhaled nitric oxide, liquid ventilation, surfactant lavage and high frequency ventilation remains to be tested.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 17%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 23%