↓ Skip to main content

Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002084.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Muralidharan, Mark Fenton

Abstract

The management of acutely disturbed people during periods of psychiatric crisis poses a particular challenge for mental health professionals. The challenge is to maintain safety while providing a safe and therapeutic environment. Non-pharmaceutical methods currently used to accomplish this include special observations, de-escalation, behavioural contracts and locking doors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 25%
Psychology 29 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 14%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,055,891
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,337
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,096
of 90,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.