↓ Skip to main content

Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002106.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wasiak, Jason, Cleland, Heather, Campbell, Fiona

Abstract

An acute burn wound is a complex and evolving injury. Extensive burns produce, in addition to local tissue damage, systemic consequences. Treatment of partial thickness burn wounds is directed towards promoting healing, and a wide variety of dressings is currently available. Improvements in technology and advances in understanding of wound healing have driven the development of new dressings. Dressing selection should be based on their effects of healing, but ease of application and removal, dressing change requirements, cost and patient comfort should also be considered. To assess the effects of burn wound dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (Searched 29/5/08); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) - The Cochrane Library Issue 2 2008; Ovid MEDLINE - 1950 to May Week 3 2008; Ovid EMBASE - 1980 to 2008 Week 21 and Ovid CINAHL - 1982 to May Week 4 2008. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of burn wound dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Two authors using standardised forms extracted the data independently. Each trial was assessed for internal validity with differences resolved by discussion. A total of 26 RCTs are included in this review and most were methodologically poor. A number of dressings appear to have some benefit over other products in the management of superficial and partial thickness burns. This benefit relates to time to wound healing, the number of dressing changes and the level of pain experienced. The use of biosynthetic dressings is associated with a decrease in time to healing and reduction in pain during dressing changes. The use of silver sulphadiazine (SSD) as a comparator on burn wounds for the full duration of treatment needs to be reconsidered, as a number of studies showed delays in time to wound healing and increased number of dressing applications in patients treated with SSD dressings. There is a paucity of high quality RCTs on dressings for superficial and partial thickness burn injury. The studies summarised in this review evaluated a variety of interventions, comparators and clinical endpoints. Despite some potentially positive findings, the evidence, which largely derives from trials with methodological shortcomings, is of limited usefulness in aiding clinicians in choosing suitable treatments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Singapore 1 1%
Bahrain 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 28 29%