↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
300 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002140.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noelle O'Rourke, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Nuria Farré Bernadó, Fergus Macbeth

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 4, 2004. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be seen as a way of increasing the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy at the same time as reducing the risks of metastatic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 267 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Other 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 62 23%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 75 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#19,985,400
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,899
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,718
of 96,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.