You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Follow‐up strategies for patients treated for non‐metastatic colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002200.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Jeffery, Brigid E Hickey, Phillip N Hider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 337 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 72 | 21% |
| Unknown | 114 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 126 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,473,270
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,144
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,324
of 353,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.