You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheryl Chooi, Julia J Cox, Richard S Lumb, Philippa Middleton, Mark Chemali, Richard S Emmett, Scott W Simmons, Allan M Cyna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 346 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
Researcher | 34 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 7% |
Other | 58 | 17% |
Unknown | 133 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
Other | 33 | 9% |
Unknown | 149 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,331,911
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,780
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,757
of 432,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.