↓ Skip to main content

Orthotic devices for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orthotic devices for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002267.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman E D'hondt, Geert Aufdemkampe, Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs, Peter AA Struijs, Claire Verheul, C N van Dijk

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a frequently reported condition in active adults. A wide variety of conservative treatment strategies have been described. As yet, no optimal strategy has been identified. Application of orthotic devices e.g. knee braces, knee straps, forms of taping of the knee, active training devices, knee sleeves and inlay soles to support the foot have been advocated to treat this condition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2012.
All research outputs
#23,084,818
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,808
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,678
of 186,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.