↓ Skip to main content

Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ho, Jacqueline J, Subramaniam, Prema, Henderson-Smart, David J, Davis, Peter G, Jacqueline J Ho, Prema Subramaniam, David J Henderson‐Smart, Peter G Davis

Abstract

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the single most important cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants (Greenough 1998, Bancalari 1992). Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) with surfactant is the standard treatment for the condition. The major difficulty with IPPV is that it is invasive, resulting in airway and lung injury and contributing to the development of chronic lung disease. In spontaneously breathing preterm infants with RDS, to determine if continuous distending airway pressure (CDAP) reduces the need for IPPV and associated morbidity without adverse effects. The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal hand searching mainly in the English language. All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation of newborn infants with RDS were eligible. Interventions were continuous distending airway pressure including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by mask, nasal prong, nasopharnygeal tube, or endotracheal tube, or continuous negative pressure (CNDP) via a chamber enclosing the thorax and lower body, compared with standard care. Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group, including independent assessment of trial quality and extraction of data by each author, were used. CDAP is associated with a lower rate of failed treatment (death or use of assisted ventilation), overall mortality, and mortality in infants with birthweights above 1500 g. The use of CDAP is associated with an increased rate of pneumothorax. In preterm infants with RDS the application of CDAP either as CPAP or CNDP is associated with some benefits, particularly in infants with birthweights over 1500 gms. The extent of this benefit is difficult to assess given the outdated methods to administer CDAP, low use of antenatal corticosteroids, non-availability of surfactant and the intensive care setting of the 1970's in which these trials were done. Where resources are limited, such as in developing countries, CPAP for RDS may have a clinical role. Further research is required to determine the best mode of administration and its role in modern intensive care settings

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 1 <1%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 21 18%