You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002783.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathryn Broderick, Lorna Watson, Matthew P Armon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 86 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 97 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,401,978
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,900
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,122
of 523,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.