↓ Skip to main content

Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002817.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L Tomlinson, Smitaa Patel, Charmaine Meek, Clare P Herd, Carl E Clarke, Rebecca Stowe, Laila Shah, Catherine M Sackley, Katherine HO Deane, Keith Wheatley, Natalie Ives

Abstract

Despite medical therapies and surgical interventions for Parkinson's disease (PD), patients develop progressive disability. Physiotherapy aims to maximise functional ability and minimise secondary complications through movement rehabilitation within a context of education and support for the whole person. The overall aim is to optimise independence, safety, and well-being, thereby enhancing quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 203 18%
Student > Master 169 15%
Researcher 100 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 7%
Other 215 19%
Unknown 276 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 322 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 162 14%
Neuroscience 69 6%
Sports and Recreations 49 4%
Psychology 41 4%
Other 174 15%
Unknown 310 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#921,507
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,806
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,837
of 211,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.