You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nocturnal non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002878.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fransien M Struik, Yves Lacasse, Roger Goldstein, Huib A.M. Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra |
| Abstract |
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is effective in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (nocturnal-NIPPV) has been proposed as an intervention for stable hypercapnic patients with COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,967,241
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,199
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,475
of 209,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.