You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digitalis for treatment of congestive heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002901.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hood WB Jr, Dans AL, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, McMurray JJ, Hood, Jr., William B, Dans, Antonio L, Guyatt, Gordon H, Jaeschke, Roman, McMurray, John JV |
| Abstract |
Digitalis glycosides have been in clinical use in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) for more than 200 years. In recent years several trials have been conducted to address concerns about efficacy and toxicity. Although a systematic review of the literature was published in 1990, an update is required to include more current trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 85% |
| Other | 8 | 62% |
| Professor | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 31% |
| Other | 9 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 200% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 23% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,764
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,433
of 58,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.