You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002902.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne H Richards, Lindsey Anderson, Caroline E Jenkinson, Ben Whalley, Karen Rees, Philippa Davies, Paul Bennett, Zulian Liu, Robert West, David R Thompson, Rod S Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 44% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 685 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 684 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 9% |
| Researcher | 59 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 114 | 17% |
| Unknown | 239 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 13% |
| Psychology | 73 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 57 | 8% |
| Unknown | 268 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,234,471
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,579
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,067
of 324,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.