You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cervico‐thoracic or lumbar sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002918.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Straube, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Peter Cole |
Abstract |
This review is an update of a review first published in Issue 2, 2003, which was substantially updated in Issue 7, 2010. The concept that many neuropathic pain syndromes (traditionally this definition would include complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS)) are "sympathetically maintained pains" has historically led to treatments that interrupt the sympathetic nervous system. Chemical sympathectomies use alcohol or phenol injections to destroy ganglia of the sympathetic chain, while surgical ablation is performed by open removal or electrocoagulation of the sympathetic chain or by minimally invasive procedures using thermal or laser interruption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
United States | 3 | 23% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Colombia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
Other | 47 | 24% |
Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 11% |
Unknown | 59 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,324,735
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,772
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,768
of 210,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.