↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002943
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Mercè Marzo Castillejo, Manel Pladevall Vila, Joan Marti, José I Emparanza

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 220 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,401,178
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,678
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,124
of 114,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.