You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drug therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003002.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Mason, Emma J Welsh, Ian Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Egypt | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 10% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 17% |
| Unknown | 134 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 7% |
| Psychology | 20 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 146 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,329,385
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,782
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,409
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.