↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for cocaine and psychostimulant amphetamines related disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for cocaine and psychostimulant amphetamines related disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003023.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Paulo Knapp, Bernardo GO Soares, Michael F Farrell, Mauricio Silva de Lima

Abstract

The consumption of psychostimulants for non-medical reasons probably occurs because of their euphoriant and psychomotor-stimulating properties. Chronic consumption of these agents results in development of stereotyped behaviour, paranoia, and possibly aggressive behaviour. Psychosocial treatments for psychostimulant use disorder are supposed to improve compliance, and to promote abstinence. Evidence from randomised controlled trials in this subject needs to be summarised. To conduct a systematic review of all RCTs on psychosocial interventions for treating psychostimulant use disorder. Electronic searches of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and LILACS (to may 2006); reference searching; personal communication; conference abstracts; unpublished trials from pharmaceutical industry; book chapters on treatment of psychostimulants abuse/ dependence. All randomised-controlled trials focusing on psychosocial interventions for treating psychostimulants abuse/ dependence. Three authors extracted the data independently and Relative Risks, weighted mean difference and number needed to treat were estimated, when possible. The reviewers assumed that people who died or dropped out had no improvement (intention to treat analysis) and tested the sensitivity of the final results to this assumption. Twenty-seven randomised controlled studies (3663 participants) fulfilled inclusion criteria and had data that could be used for at least one of the main comparisons. There was a wide heterogeneity in the interventions evaluated: this did not allow to provide a summary estimate of effect and results cannot be summarised in a clear cut way. The comparisons between different type of Behavioural Interventions showed results in favour of treatments with some form of Contingency management in respect to both reducing drop outs and lowering cocaine use.. Overall this review reports little significant behavioural changes with reductions in rates of drug consumption following an intervention. Moreover, with the evidence currently available, there are no data supporting a single treatment approach that is able to comprise the multidimensional facets of addiction patterns and to significantly yield better outcomes to resolve the chronic, relapsing nature of addiction, with all its correlates and consequences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Psychology 13 19%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 29%