↓ Skip to main content

Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
314 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003120.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline Birks, John Grimley Evans

Abstract

Extracts of the leaves of the maidenhair tree, Ginkgo biloba, have long been used in China as a traditional medicine for various disorders of health. A standardized extract is widely prescribed for the treatment of a range of conditions including memory and concentration problems, confusion, depression, anxiety, dizziness, tinnitus and headache. The mechanisms of action are thought to reflect the action of several components of the extract and include increasing blood supply by dilating blood vessels, reducing blood viscosity, modification of neurotransmitter systems, and reducing the density of oxygen free radicals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 432 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 16%
Researcher 61 14%
Student > Master 48 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Other 27 6%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 114 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Psychology 28 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 6%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 133 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#398,664
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#692
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,158
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.