You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003241.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie M Pomeroy, Linda M King, Alex Pollock, Alison Baily‐Hallam, Peter Langhorne |
| Abstract |
Electrostimulation might improve motor recovery after stroke by providing neuromuscular re-training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 13% |
| Engineering | 26 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,811,404
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,625
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,603
of 84,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.