↓ Skip to main content

Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methenamine hippurate for preventing urinary tract infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003265.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee, Bon San B, Simpson, Judy M, Craig, Jonathan C, Bhuta, Tushar, Lee, B B, Simpson, J M, Craig, J C, Bhuta, T

Abstract

Methenamine salts are often used as an alternative to antibiotics for the prevention of urinary tract infection (UTI). To assess the benefits and harms of methenamine hippurate in preventing UTI. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (from 1950), EMBASE (from 1980), reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction. Manufacturers' of methenamine salts were contacted for unpublished studies and contact was made with known investigators. Date of last search: September 2006 Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-RCTs of methenamine hippurate used for the prevention of UTIs in all population groups were eligible. A comparison with a control/no treatment group was a prerequisite for selection. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). An exploration of heterogeneity and a detailed description of results, grouped by population, was undertaken. Thirteen studies (2032 participants) were included. Six studies (654 patients) reported symptomatic UTI and eight studies (796 patients) reported bacteriuria. Overall, study quality was mixed. The overall pooled estimates for the major outcome measures were not interpretable because of underlying heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses suggested that methenamine hippurate may have some benefit in patients without renal tract abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; bacteriuria: RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83), but not in patients with known renal tract abnormalities (symptomatic UTI: RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 6.20; bacteriuria: RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.07). For short-term treatment duration (1 week or less) there was a significant reduction in symptomatic UTI in those without renal tract abnormalities (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.38). The rate of adverse events was low. Methenamine hippurate may be effective for preventing UTI in patients without renal tract abnormalities, particularly when used for short-term prophylaxis. It does not appear to work in patients with neuropathic bladder or in patients who have renal tract abnormalities. The rate of adverse events was low, but poorly described. There is a need for further large well-conducted RCTs to clarify this question, particularly for longer term use for people without neuropathic bladder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Other 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%