You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Removal of nail polish and finger rings to prevent surgical infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003325.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vickie A Arrowsmith, Rosemary Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Chile | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,451,254
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,071
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,103
of 242,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.