↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine agonists for cocaine dependence

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopamine agonists for cocaine dependence
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soares, Bernardo, Lima Reisser, Anelise ARL, Farrell, Michael, Silva de Lima, Maurício

Abstract

Cocaine dependence is a common and serious condition, which has become nowadays a substantial public health problem. There is a wide and well documented range of consequences associated to chronic use of this drug, such as medical, psychological and social problems, including the spread of infectious diseases (e.g. AIDS, hepatitis and tuberculosis), crime, violence and neonatal drug exposure. Therapeutic management of the cocaine addicts includes an initial period of abstinence from the drug. During this phase the subjects may experience, besides the intense craving for cocaine, symptoms such as depression, fatigue, irritability, anorexia, and sleep disturbances. It was demonstrated that the acute use of cocaine may enhance dopamine transmission and chronically it decreases dopamine concentrations in the brain. Pharmacological treatment that affects dopamine could theoretically reduce these symptoms and contribute to a more successful therapeutic approach. To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine dependence. Electronic searches of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, Biological Abstracts and LILACS; reference searching; personal communication; conference abstracts; unpublished trials from pharmaceutical industry; book chapters on treatment of cocaine dependence, was performed for the primary version of this review in 2001. Another search of the electronic databases was done in December of 2002 for this update. The specialised register of trials of the Cochrane Group on Drugs and Alcohol was searched until February 2003. The inclusion criteria for all randomised controlled trials were that they should focus on the use of dopamine agonists on the treatment of cocaine dependence. The reviewers extracted the data independently and Relative Risks, weighted mean difference and number needed to treat were estimated. The reviewers assumed that people who died or dropped out had no improvement and tested the sensitivity of the final results to this assumption. Seventeen studies were included, with 1224 participants randomised. Amantadine, bromocriptine, and pergolide were the drugs evaluated. The main outcomes evaluated were positive urine sample for cocaine metabolites, for efficacy, and retention in treatment, as an acceptability measure. There were no significant differences between interventions, and in trials where participants had primary cocaine dependence or had additional diagnosis of opioid dependence and/or were in methadone maintenance treatment. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of cocaine dependence. Given the high rate of dropouts in this population, clinicians may consider adding other supportive measures aiming to keep patients in treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Psychology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 37%