You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003370.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorna Gibson, David Lawrence, Claire Dawson, Judith Bliss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 24% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,857,628
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,973
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,514
of 106,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.