You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003391 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josué Bacaltchuk, Phillipa PJ Hay |
| Abstract |
Bulimia Nervosa (BN) represents an important public health problem and is related to serious morbidity and even mortality. This review attempted to systematically evaluate the use of antidepressant medications compared with placebo for the treatment of bulimia nervosa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 29% |
| Psychology | 31 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,322,514
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,055
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,094
of 56,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.