You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Homoeopathy for induction of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline A Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 26 | 20% |
| Japan | 20 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Grenada | 1 | <1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 70 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 93% |
| Scientists | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#295,083
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#491
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216
of 56,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.