↓ Skip to main content

Steroid therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Steroid therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003485
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meredith C Ward, John KH Sinn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,891
of 56,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.