You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lithium versus antidepressants in the long‐term treatment of unipolar affective disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003492.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Cipriani, Katharine A Smith, Sally SA Burgess, Stuart M Carney, Guy Goodwin, John Geddes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 25% |
| Unknown | 52 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 32% |
| Psychology | 29 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,726,738
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,261
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,739
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.