↓ Skip to main content

Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in this source, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003519.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moore, Elizabeth R, Anderson, Gene C, Bergman, Nils

Abstract

Mother-infant separation postbirth is common in Western culture. Early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) begins ideally at birth and involves placing the naked baby, covered across the back with a warm blanket, prone on the mother's bare chest. According to mammalian neuroscience, the intimate contact inherent in this place (habitat) evokes neurobehaviors ensuring fulfillment of basic biological needs. This time may represent a psychophysiologically 'sensitive period' for programming future behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 297 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 16%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Postgraduate 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Researcher 24 8%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Psychology 29 9%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 71 23%