You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003642.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Ping Liu, Mei Zhang, Weiya Wang, Sameline Grimsgaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 21% |
| Unknown | 59 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,098,058
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,406
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,046
of 47,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.