↓ Skip to main content

Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003751.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa M Moore, Solange Rivera Mercado, Mónica Grez Artigues, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract

This is an updated version of a review that was originally published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 2004, Issue 2. People with cancer, their families and carers have a high prevalence of psychological stress which may be minimised by effective communication and support from their attending healthcare professionals (HCPs). Research suggests communication skills do not reliably improve with experience, therefore, considerable effort is dedicated to courses that may improve communication skills for HCPs involved in cancer care. A variety of communication skills training (CST) courses have been proposed and are in practice. We conducted this review to determine whether CST works and which types of CST, if any, are the most effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 363 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 14%
Researcher 47 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Other 21 6%
Other 77 21%
Unknown 91 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 25%
Psychology 58 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 14%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 106 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,638,313
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,218
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,423
of 210,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.