↓ Skip to main content

Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003799.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Hogervorst, Kristine Yaffe, Marcus Richards, Felicia AH Huppert

Abstract

As estrogens have been shown to have several potentially beneficial effects on the central nervous system, it is biologically plausible that maintaining high levels of estrogens in postmenopausal women by means of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) could be protective against cognitive decline in women with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other dementia syndromes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Psychology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 66 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,360,575
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,655
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,228
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.