You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003799.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva Hogervorst, Kristine Yaffe, Marcus Richards, Felicia AH Huppert |
Abstract |
As estrogens have been shown to have several potentially beneficial effects on the central nervous system, it is biologically plausible that maintaining high levels of estrogens in postmenopausal women by means of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) could be protective against cognitive decline in women with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other dementia syndromes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 26 | 14% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 54 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 20% |
Psychology | 20 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 14% |
Unknown | 66 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,360,575
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,655
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,228
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.