You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rehabilitation interventions for foot drop in neuromuscular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003908.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine M Sackley, Peter B Disler, Lynne Turner-Stokes, Derick T Wade, Nicola Brittle, Thomas Hoppitt |
| Abstract |
"Foot drop" or "Floppy foot drop" is the term commonly used to describe weakness or contracture of the muscles around the ankle joint. It may arise from many neuromuscular diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 24% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,936,629
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,270
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,160
of 255,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#217
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.