You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline A Smith, Brian Peat |
| Abstract |
Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) to the acupuncture point Bladder 67 (BL67) (Chinese name Zhiyin), located at the tip of the fifth toe, has been proposed as a way of correcting breech presentation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 13% |
| Italy | 6 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#560,068
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#980
of 13,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,591
of 177,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.