↓ Skip to main content

Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003983.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Sahuquillo, F Arikan

Abstract

High intracranial pressure (ICP) is the most frequent cause of death and disability after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). High ICP is treated by general maneuvers (normothermia, sedation etc) and a set of first line therapeutic measures (moderate hypocapnia, mannitol etc). When these measures fail to control high ICP, second line therapies are started. Among these, second line therapies such as barbiturates, hyperventilation, moderate hypothermia or removal of a variable amount of skull bone (known as decompressive craniectomy) are used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 320 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 18%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Other 33 10%
Other 94 28%
Unknown 37 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 57%
Neuroscience 28 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Psychology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 47 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,593,798
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,856
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,568
of 171,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.