You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003983.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J Sahuquillo, F Arikan |
Abstract |
High intracranial pressure (ICP) is the most frequent cause of death and disability after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). High ICP is treated by general maneuvers (normothermia, sedation etc) and a set of first line therapeutic measures (moderate hypocapnia, mannitol etc). When these measures fail to control high ICP, second line therapies are started. Among these, second line therapies such as barbiturates, hyperventilation, moderate hypothermia or removal of a variable amount of skull bone (known as decompressive craniectomy) are used. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Denmark | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 320 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 59 | 18% |
Student > Master | 38 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 10% |
Other | 33 | 10% |
Other | 94 | 28% |
Unknown | 37 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 57% |
Neuroscience | 28 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
Psychology | 14 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,593,798
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,856
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,568
of 171,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.