You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Noninvasive positive‐pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004127.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen EA Burns, Maureen O Meade, Azra Premji, Neill KJ Adhikari |
| Abstract |
Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) provides ventilatory support without the need for an invasive airway. Interest has emerged in using NPPV to facilitate earlier removal of an endotracheal tube and to decrease complications associated with prolonged intubation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 402 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 21% |
| Unknown | 125 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 187 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 134 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,546,794
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,328
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,720
of 321,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.