You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for improving patients' trust in doctors and groups of doctors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004134.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alix Rolfe, Lucinda Cash‐Gibson, Josip Car, Aziz Sheikh, Brian McKinstry |
Abstract |
Trust is a fundamental component of the patient-doctor relationship and is associated with increased satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and continuity of care. Our 2006 review found little evidence that interventions improve patients' trust in their doctor; therefore an updated search was required to find out if there is further evidence of the effects of interventions that may improve trust in doctors or groups of doctors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 38% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
Scientists | 6 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 604 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 96 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 13% |
Researcher | 80 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 64 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
Other | 118 | 19% |
Unknown | 142 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 12% |
Psychology | 62 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 49 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 2% |
Other | 97 | 16% |
Unknown | 156 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,084,686
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,201
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,469
of 236,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.