You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004148.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen F.S. Kaner, Heather O Dickinson, Fiona R Beyer, Fiona Campbell, Carla Schlesinger, Nick Heather, John B Saunders, Bernard Burnand, Elizabeth D Pienaar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 327 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 19% |
| Researcher | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 37% |
| Psychology | 59 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#700,089
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,293
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,131
of 91,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.