↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004197.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon C Langton Hewer, Alan R Smyth, Langton Hewer SC, Smyth AR, Langton Hewer, Simon C, Smyth, Alan R

Abstract

Respiratory tract infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa occurs in most people with cystic fibrosis. Once chronic infection is established, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is virtually impossible to eradicate and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early infection may be easier to eradicate.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003, and previously updated in 2006 and 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,142,023
of 24,129,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,649
of 12,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,171
of 264,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,129,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.