You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004260.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa A Harvey, Lucie Brosseau, Robert D Herbert |
| Abstract |
Arthritis of the knee is a common problem causing pain and disability. If severe, knee arthritis can be surgically managed with a total knee arthroplasty. Rehabilitation following knee arthroplasty often includes continuous passive motion (CPM). CPM is applied by a machine that passively and repeatedly moves the knee through a specified range of motion (ROM). It is believed that CPM increases recovery of knee ROM and has other therapeutic benefits. However, it is not clear whether CPM is effective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 24% |
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 73 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 17% |
| Unknown | 118 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 99 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 4% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Unknown | 134 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#892,861
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,727
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,583
of 322,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.