You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004272.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenna Morgan, Lynda Wyld, Karen A Collins, Malcolm W Reed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,923,192
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,245
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,681
of 227,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.