You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004320.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pui Yee Grace Choy, Ian P Bissett, James G Docherty, Bryan R Parry, Arend Merrie, Anita Fitzgerald |
| Abstract |
Ileocolic anastomoses are commonly performed for right-sided colon cancer and Crohn's disease. The anastomosis may be constructed using a linear cutter stapler or by suturing. Individual trials comparing stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomoses have found little difference in the complication rate but they have lacked adequate power to detect potential small difference. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Egypt | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,781,410
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,916
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,890
of 136,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.