You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tranexamic acid for patients with nasal haemorrhage (epistaxis)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004328.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Joseph, Pablo Martinez‐Devesa, Jenny Bellorini, Martin J Burton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 16% |
| Japan | 10 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 292 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 124 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 141 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#562,327
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#988
of 13,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,587
of 448,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.