You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intravenous immunoglobulin for presumed viral myocarditis in children and adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004370.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Robinson, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer, Terry P Klassen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,307,749
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,504
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,708
of 284,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.