You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for actinic keratoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004415.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aditya K Gupta, Maryse Paquet, Elmer Villanueva, William Brintnell |
| Abstract |
Actinic keratoses are a skin disease caused by long-term sun exposure, and their lesions have the potential to develop into squamous cell carcinoma. Treatments for actinic keratoses are sought for cosmetic reasons, for the relief of associated symptoms, or for the prevention of skin cancer development. Detectable lesions are often associated with alteration of the surrounding skin (field) where subclinical lesions might be present. The interventions available for the treatment of actinic keratoses include individual lesion-based (e.g. cryotherapy) or field-directed (e.g. topical) treatments. These might vary in terms of efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 463 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 13% |
| Researcher | 53 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 89 | 19% |
| Unknown | 119 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 138 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,605,172
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,247
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,976
of 287,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.