↓ Skip to main content

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004485.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Millett, Declan T, Glenny, Anne-Marie, Mattick, Rye CR, Hickman, Joy, Mandall, Nicky A

Abstract

Orthodontic treatment involves using fixed or removable appliances (dental braces) to correct the positions of teeth. It has been shown that the quality of treatment result obtained with fixed appliances is much better than with removable appliances. Fixed appliances are, therefore, favoured by most orthodontists for treatment. The success of a fixed orthodontic appliance depends on the metal attachments (brackets and bands) being attached securely to the teeth so that they do not become loose during treatment. Brackets are usually attached to the front and side teeth, whereas bands (metal rings that go round the teeth) are more commonly used on the back teeth (molars). A number of adhesives are available to attach bands to teeth and it is important to understand which group of adhesives bond most reliably, as well as reducing or preventing dental decay during the treatment period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 31%