↓ Skip to main content

Long versus short inspiratory times in neonates receiving mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long versus short inspiratory times in neonates receiving mechanical ventilation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004503.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Omar Farouk Kamlin, Peter G Davis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 30 15%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 16 8%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 57 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 65 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#22,830,981
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,281
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,936
of 56,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.